Saturday, December 12, 2009

how memory works

I just finished Black White and Jewish: Autobiography of a Shifting Self by Rebecca Walker. It was good, particularly the ending. The last vignette of the book is a reflection on Walker's experience at her paternal grandmother's funeral. She writes about her sadness at this woman's death and the fact that she mourns her Jewish grandmother in a way her brother and sister cannot. Unlike Walker, they are all white, all Jewish, and far younger. They are more greatly linked to the grandmother figure by blood, but not by memory. 



Walker contends that memory is what undergirds our allegiances and builds our families and emotional investments. This assertion, of course, is the argument Walker makes throughout the memoir about her own identity; she is the people she has loved, the things she has felt and experienced and lost, the places she has lived in and left. She is everything documented in the pages of the book far more than she is 'her blood' or any of the identities crafted for her by others based upon that blood identity. Surely, different moments of her past have a particular color and gender and religion, but she is, ultimately, what she remembers. 


Walker writes:


"It seems to me, that this, too, is how memory works. What we remember of what was done to us shapes our view, molds us, sets our stance. But what we remember is past, it no longer exists, and yet we hold on to it, live by it, surrender so much control to it. What do we become when we put down the scripts written by history and memory, when each person before us can be seen free of the cultural or personal narrative we've inherited or devised? When we, ourselves, can taste that freedom."


I have read several good books this year with unsatisfactory, easily forgotten endings. I will remember this one. It made the book feel whole. 


What more could a writer want? 

2 comments:

  1. Walker's words remind me of Margaret Farley's definition of freedom in her book Just Love. I dont' remember exactly, but it is something about not being able to predict with any information someone's decisions. Something like that...

    Anyway. It's an important type of freedom, to be free from our past. Not in a amnesia kind of way, but in a non-binding kind of way. Interesting.

    Thank you for posting zafatista :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Jonathan, thank you for reading. :)

    I agree it is important not to let the past (whether that is family legacies, past pain, or our own failings) determine our futures. You will find the Margaret Farley definition you are referring to below.

    "Freedom is a capacity to determine oneself in a way that is not totally explainable in terms of the past, of what has already come to be, what one already is. The capacity for free choice is the capacity to introduce something new into what one is - as when we ratify love in a new way, nurture an attitude that is only partially formed, develop talents in this way or that, attempt to gain possessions or to let them go, respond to a call that still beckons, or choose against all calls and all loves and hence end up alone." - Margaret Farley, JUST LOVE: A Framework for Christian Sexual Ethics

    ReplyDelete

*copyright

don't steal words! don't steal images! if you want to borrow something, ask.